(To skip the retrospective, jump to
The Next Step in the Evolution of Online Training)
The Evolution of Technology Training
In the heady
pre-internet days, I would dive into a new language or technology by
surrounding myself with dictionary-sized books on the topic. I made sure to use books from different publishers so I would have explanations of a particular topic from different points of view. When one book would come up short, I could usually fill in the gaps with another.
In the mid
90s, boot-camp training exploded. Students pay hundreds to thousands of dollars to spend 3-5 days in
intensive, hands-on sessions with a new concept and an experienced instructor. Quality crested, then dropped as training centers learned that they were more profitable using less experienced instructors and reusable mediocre course material. VHS and DVD training experienced a similar birth and devolution in the at-home training market.
Once the internet backbone was
robust enough to support video, some enterprising business folk realized
that presenting an entire course online would have the same net effect
as an in-person course, minus the ability for students to ask questions of the instructor. Moreover, the content providers
no longer needed expensive training facilities, and could pay their
instructors for a single recorded engagement rather than multiple in-person sessions. Win-win.
Lynda.com rocketed to popularity by creating polished presentations using fresh
content and a consistent course format. Early on, Lynda.com focused on the art side of
technology, leaving room for other companies to bring the same formula
to programming and technology infrastructure like PluralSight, Udemy, CodeAcademy and others. (Lynda has since broadened its catalog to include programming topics, but still focuses on the artistic side of technology.)
This is pretty much the state of online training
today. Instructional videos are essentially desktop video capture interspersed with power-point slides - a technique that is clearly effective.
The Next Step in the Evolution of Online Training
Several months ago, I was looking for "instructor led online training". I wanted the benefits of on-demand learning with the extra benefit of having someone to talk to when I had questions. This led me to LearningLine (Link removed as the site is now defunct :/ ). While initially unimpressed, LearningLine employed two techniques that helped me learn far more from their classes than from any other online training class I have taken to date.
Let me stop right here to say: this is
not going to be a whitewash review. LearingLine, an offshoot of 20-year classroom training veteran DevelopMentor, is a newcomer to the online training space and it shows. Frankly, their UI is awful. As a long time user of Lynda.com and PluralSight courses, I felt cheated when navigating through the cheap-looking LearningLine interface. It was my actual learning experience that prompted me to write this blog post. For me, the techniques they use make it worth suffering through LearningLine's inadequacies.
Real-World Resources
I took an ASP.NET MVC course through LearningLine. Unlike self-contained training courses I have taken in the past, LearningLine points you to industry sources on the internet like Microsoft Blogs, Microsoft reference pages, YouTube videos, Microsoft Evangelist websites...etc. At first, I thought that this was a cop-out; they were co-opting the work of others instead of creating new content. Then, I realized that these were resources that I could use on my own long after the course was done. For the ASP.NET class, I now had a list of well known industry bloggers to follow and Microsoft resources to use. Introducing this sort of external dependency does make LearningLine's courses fragile. I can only hope they have some sort of robust link checking system in place to ensure critical pieces of their course material don't disappear overnight.
Here is a Concept and How It Works. Now Figure This Out!
The second, most effective learning technique came at the end of the lesson. Each segment of the course starts out in the ordinary way: Present a concept, demonstrate it and close with an exercise for the student to work. The exercise, however, was not what I was expecting. In every course I have taken online, the exercise is identical to the presentation example with a few inputs changed. LearningLine, however, challenged me with an exercise that was related to the topic but required information not presented in the source material to complete.
Again, I scoffed at this, thinking LearningLine threw the course into the wild without a proper review to ensure the questions matched the lesson taught. (In fact, even as I write this, I truly hope this was intentional and not some fortuitous accident.)
While researching a question, I would invariably stumble across really cool related topics that would pull me down the rabbit hole. When Google would come up dry, I was inspired to hack out the answers through trial and error (and occasionally blog about the results.) I didn't realize it until much later, but once I returned to LearningLine to answer the question, I had piles of useful related material that helped me stitch the lessons together into a complete understanding of the topic.
It occurred to me that LearningLine was breaking its students out of the classroom and sticking them into real-world, work scenarios. When solving a coding problem in my job, the answer is never
textbook. Often times, you will have experience with a vaguely related scenario, but won't know the best approach. You have to synthesize your answer from bits and pieces of information you find through research and trial and error.
Reject the Spoon!
More than just a dose of reality, not having answers spoon-fed inspires engagement. Instead of trying to figure out how to answer the question correctly, I found myself wanting to understand how to solve the problem. It's the difference between wanting to pass the course and wanting to understand what is being taught.
I hope Lynda.com, PluralSight, Udemy and others take note of this technique. Any teaching method that inspires interest and learning in the self-study education arena should be adopted universally. Speaking to LearningLine, I hope this technique was indeed intentional. Explaining the technique up front will clear up any ambiguity and will put your students in the right frame of mind at the outset.
